The applicable standard of review determines how much deference an appellate court gives a lower court’s decision. Discretionary decisions are review under the “abuse of discretion” standard where the process the lower court used to reach its decision is scrutinized. Three scholars attempts to define this standard are first analyzed followed by cases that have molded the standard. Advice to practitioners concludes the article.
Martha S. Davis,
Standards of Review: Judicial Review of Discretionary Decisionmaking,
2 J. App. Prac. & Process 47
Available at: http://lawrepository.ualr.edu/appellatepracticeprocess/vol2/iss1/6